A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Here to foster information exchange with the library community. Hey everyone. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. I submitted a paper to Nature on Sunday Nov 20. Clicking on the "Submissions being processed" link. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. This decision is the sole responsibility of the journal editor. Manuscript then goes into said editor's pile, and waits until it gets to the front of the line. For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. Sample the courses for free. But in view of. Reviewers may choose to be identified to the authors or to remain anonymous. *Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. Editors can track the transfer offer under 'Submissions with Decision' section of the main menu or via Search Submissions. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. The acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is based on the appraisal of the paper by two or more reviewers and the editor. The Science Editor will examine the manuscript to see if it meets the basic acceptance criteria. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. Not sure what the right forum is for this. [CDATA[// > Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Geology: https://geology.msubmit.net Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. That being said, they've probably done an initial review and didn't flat out reject it, so that is a good thing! We welcome people and content from all related fields. The permissions to draft and send decision letters can be configured differently by editor role and decision term. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. //-->